Skip to main content
. 1998 Oct 1;512(Pt 1):17–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.017bf.x

Table 3.

Comparison of the effects of 10 mm Mg2+ application during a 100 μm NMDA-evoked steady-state current in the presence of 1 or 10 μm ifenprodil

Fast potentiation Slow potentiation


τ (ms) Peak (% control) τ (ms) Maximum (% control) Fast decay τ (ms) Slow decay τ (ms)
1 μm ifenprodil 12 ± 1 187 ± 12*11 7230 ± 1167 249 ± 21†1,2 23 ± 3 6104 ± 1157
10 μm ifenprodil 18 ± 3 168 ± 9*1,*2 175±7†2*2 19 ± 2

*Not significantly different *1 P > 0.22 *2 P > 0.11, Student's t test † Significantly different †1,2 P < 0.002, Student's t test