Skip to main content
. 1998 Oct 15;512(Pt 2):603–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.603be.x

Table 2.

GL architecture

Pennation angle (deg) Fibre length (mm) Thickness (mm)



P C D P C D P C D
Rest
 M 10.2 ± 1.2 10.9 ± 1.4 10.2 ± 1.8 72.5 ± 3.6 72.5 ± 2.6 72.5 ± 2.9 15.3 ± 1.2 15.6 ± 0.7 15.5 ± 1.4
 MS 11.0 ± 2.0 11.3 ± 1.2 10.5 ± 1.9 72.0 ± 3.7 74.0 ± 3.4 73.3 ± 3.8 15.0 ± 1.4 15.2 ± 1.0 15.5 ± 1.5
 L 10.5 ± 2.0 11.0 ± 1.9 11.1 ± 0.6 72.0 ± 3.8 73.0 ± 2.8 72.8 ± 3.0 16.2 ± 2.0 16.0 ± 1.0 15.3 ± 0.6
MVC
 M 35.9 ± 3.2 36.3 ± 2.9 36.4 ± 2.2 33.2 ± 0.6 32.9 ± 3.2 32.2 ± 3.0 22.5 ± 3.0 22.0 ± 3.2 21.8 ± 3.3
 MS 37.0 ± 1.5 35.0 ± 2.4 36.5 ± 0.9 34.0 ± 2.5 35.0 ± 3.0 34.5 ± 1.5 22.0 ± 2.7 22.0 ± 2.3 22.0 ± 2.9
 L 36.0 ± 2.5 36.9 ± 2.9 36.1 ± 3.0 33.3 ± 3.0 33.8 ± 2.9 33.2 ± 2.5 22.0 ± 0.6 21.0 ± 2.8 21.0 ± 0.8

Analysis of GL architecture at the neutral ankle position along (regions P, C and D) and across (sections M, MS and L) its belly (see Fig. 3), at rest and during an ankle plantarflexor MVC. Mean ± s.d. values from three subjects on which all measurements were taken are presented, except

values from all six subjects.