Skip to main content
. 1998 Dec 15;513(Pt 3):775–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.775ba.x

Table 1.

Effect of [K+]o reduction on membrane potential under various ionic compositions

Test solution n Vrest(con) (mV) Vrest (test) (mV) ΔVrest (mV) Percentage of firing (mV)
A 0.1 K+ 99 −76.1 ± 0.3 −137.7 ± 2.3 19.8 ± 1.6 62.6
B K+ free 11 −75.8 ± 0.6 −154.7 ± 4.3* 14.3 ± 3.1 54.5
C 0.1 K+ 26 −74.3 ± 0.9 −144.0 ± 4.0 26.4 ± 3.0 100.0
La3+, 0.1 K+ 26 −75.5 ± 0.8 −157.6 ±1.3 * 12.1 ± 1.2 * 3.8
D NMDG, 0.1 K+ 12 −73.4 ± 0.8 −144.2 ± 4.8 19.2 ± 2.8 75.0
E Asp, 0.1 K+ 9 −75.4 ± 1.0 −146.4 ± 5.8 23.1 ± 5.4 77.8
F 10 EGTAi, 0.1 K+ 27 −73.0 ± 0.3 −134.2 ± 4.5 26.1 ± 4.4 70.4
G 10 BAPTAi, 0.1 K+ 16 −74.4 ± 0.4 −147.0 ± 1.6 * 29.0 ± 4.9 75.0

Test solutions in A–F were introduced after normal Tyrode solution. n, number of experiments; Vrest (con), resting membrane potential measured as the most negative potential (Vrest) in normal Tyrode solution given by means ±s.e.m.; Vrest (test), Vrest in the presence of low [K+]o; ΔVrest, depolarization amplitude as the largest positive deflection from Vrest; percentage of firing, percentage of the trials associated with firing of action potentials. 0.1 K+, 0.1 mm[K+]o; La3+, 0.1 mm La3+; Asp, aspartate; 10 EGTAi, in the presence of 10 mm EGTA in the pipette solution. 10 BAPTAi, in the presence of 10mm BAPTA in the pipette solution.

*

Denotes the significant differences compared with A, except for C where control experiments were done using the same cells.