Table 1.
Optimization results for the GMA glycolitic model in S. cerevisiae. Constraint violations are shown in boldface. GP column stands for both methods
| variable | basal | IOM | GP & SQP |
| (times basal) | |||
| X1 | 0.03456 | 2.1946 | 2.0000 |
| X2 | 1.0110 | 1.5801 | 2.0000 |
| X3 | 9.1876 | 1.5294 | 2.0000 |
| X4 | 0.009532 | 1.1936 | 2.0000 |
| X5 | 1.1278 | 0.2803 | 0.5000 |
| X6 | 19.7 | 7.4873 | 7.3343 |
| X7 | 68.5 | 3.8583 | 3.7794 |
| X8 | 31.7 | 2.9176 | 2.8577 |
| X9 | 49.9 | 6.4799 | 4.7179 |
| X10 | 3440 | 5.7195 | 4.1642 |
| X11 | 14.31 | 0.0100 | 0.0100 |
| X12 | 203 | 0.0100 | 0.0100 |
| X13 | 25.1 | 27.0452 | 14.0396 |
| X14 | 0.042 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
| Flux | 30.2231 | 214.6250 | 198.8542 |