Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1961 Nov;47(11):1860–1868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.47.11.1860

PERFORMANCE IN EYELID CONDITIONING AS A FUNCTION REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES AND CHANGES IN THEM*

Kenneth W Spence 1, Milton A Trapold 1
PMCID: PMC223226  PMID: 13915649

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. GOODRICH K. P. Performance in different segments of an instrumental response chain as a function of reinforcement schedule. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Jan;57(1):57–63. doi: 10.1037/h0043228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. GRANT D. A., SCHIPPER L. M. The acquisition and extinction of conditioned eyelid responses as a function of the percentage of fixed ratio random reinforcement. J Exp Psychol. 1952 Apr;43(4):313–320. doi: 10.1037/h0057186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. MCALLISTER W. R. Eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-US interval. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Jun;45(6):417–422. doi: 10.1037/h0059534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. REYNOLDS W. F. Acquisition and extinction of the conditioned eyelid response following partial and continuous reinforcement. J Exp Psychol. 1958 Apr;55(4):335–341. doi: 10.1037/h0042202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. ROSS L. E., SPENCE K. W. Eyelid conditioning performance under partial reinforcement as a function of UCS intensity. J Exp Psychol. 1960 Jun;59:379–382. doi: 10.1037/h0043717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ROSS L. E. The decremental effects of partial reinforcement during acquisition of the conditioned eyelid response. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Feb;57(2):74–82. doi: 10.1037/h0046965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SPENCE K. W., FARBER I. E. Conditioning and extinction as a function of anxiety. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Feb;45(2):116–119. doi: 10.1037/h0055234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SPENCE K. W., HAGGARD D. F., ROSS L. E. UCS intensity and the associative (habit) strength of the eyelid CR. J Exp Psychol. 1958 May;55(5):404–411. doi: 10.1037/h0048257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SPENCE K. W., ROSS L. E. A methodological study of the form and latency of eyelid responses in conditioning. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Nov;58:376–381. doi: 10.1037/h0045837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SPENCE K. W., TAYLOR J. Anxiety and strength of the UCS as determiners of the amount of eyelid conditioning. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Sep;42(3):183–188. doi: 10.1037/h0061580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. WEINSTOCK S. Acquisition and extinction of a partially reinforced running response at a 24-hour intertrial interval. J Exp Psychol. 1958 Aug;56(2):151–158. doi: 10.1037/h0041385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES