Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 31;4:22. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-4-22

Table 3.

WRST results, if the contribution of a partition to the nodes of either Fig. 1 or Fig. 5A is beneficial or detrimental.

Morphology
PABA4 PABA3 PABA2 PBS NDI PABSA3 PABSA2 LILD
Fig. 1 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 0.19602
Fig. 5A 0.00556 0.07690 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 0.07926
RAG1
Fig. 1 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001
Fig. 5A < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001
rRNA
Fig. 1 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001
Fig. 5A < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 0.00001
mtDNA
Fig. 1 0.00768 0.03220 0.00842 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001
Fig. 5A 0.00446 0.16574 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 < 0.00001 0.00002

p values of the WRST are given for each partition, each approach and the two sets of nodes. Italic values indicate that the negative rank sum was larger than the positive rank sum and thus the contribution of the partition is detrimental to this set of nodes given the used approach. If they are also bold this difference was significant.