Table 3.
Morphology | ||||||||
PABA4 | PABA3 | PABA2 | PBS | NDI | PABSA3 | PABSA2 | LILD | |
Fig. 1 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | 0.19602 |
Fig. 5A | 0.00556 | 0.07690 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | 0.07926 |
RAG1 | ||||||||
Fig. 1 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 |
Fig. 5A | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 |
rRNA | ||||||||
Fig. 1 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 |
Fig. 5A | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
mtDNA | ||||||||
Fig. 1 | 0.00768 | 0.03220 | 0.00842 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 |
Fig. 5A | 0.00446 | 0.16574 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | < 0.00001 | 0.00002 |
p values of the WRST are given for each partition, each approach and the two sets of nodes. Italic values indicate that the negative rank sum was larger than the positive rank sum and thus the contribution of the partition is detrimental to this set of nodes given the used approach. If they are also bold this difference was significant.