Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 31;4:22. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-4-22

Table 6.

Percentage disagreement of the different approaches to each other at all nodes.

Negative values (conflict) Positive values (contribution) Mean
PABA4 PABA3 PABA2 PBS NDI PABSA3 PABSA2 LILD
PABA4 4.30 9.78 3.23 8.60 1.08 9.68 4.30 5.85
0.00 0.00 0.00 2.70 0.00 0.00 1.82 0.65
PABA3 4.30 7.33 3.27 8.50 3.27 5.88 2.61 5.02
2.22 2.20 1.18 5.36 1.22 0.00 1.10 1.90
PABA2 14.13 7.33 6.35 10.58 7.41 5.82 1.59 7.60
11.54 6.59 4.03 8.87 5.43 3.94 0.00 5.77
PBS 15.05 11.11 13.76 12.00 9.00 13.00 5.00 11.27
15.38 9.41 7.26 13.51 10.26 11.86 4.96 10.38
NDI 5.38 6.54 6.88 2.50 3.50 7.50 2.50 4.97
0.00 3.57 4.03 2.70 1.85 4.39 1.61 2.59
PABSA3 7.53 7.19 8.99 4.00 8.00 6.50 2.50 6.39
2.22 2.44 3.10 1.71 4.63 3.64 2.34 2.87
PABSA2 13.98 8.50 6.88 6.50 10.50 5.00 2.00 7.62
7.69 4.60 2.36 2.54 8.77 3.64 0.00 4.23
LILD 38.71 27.45 22.75 18.00 25.00 20.50 21.50 24.84
27.27 21.98 14.93 18.18 27.42 22.66 19.84 21.75

The percentage is relative to the total number of data pairs in pairwise comparisons of the approaches. The upper values were obtained considering all pairs and the lower value considering only pairs, which had at least one significant value. For example, in the comparison of PABA4 to PABA3 in 4.3% of the data pairs PABA4 had a negative value while PABA3 had a positive one, when all pairs were considered, and in 0% of the data pairs, when only pairs with at least one significant value were considered. For PBS, the Templeton [70] test results were not considered.