Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 4.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2007 Feb 25;180(1):95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.02.029

Fig. 2. Instrumental learning in Non-Tr, Step-Tr, and Stand-Tr rats following 7 wks of step training or unilateral hindlimb stand training.

Fig. 2

The flexion duration (A) and the number of flexion responses (C) for each 1 min bin over 30 min of testing are shown, as are the overall average test flexion durations (B) and response numbers (D). For flexion duration, Non-Tr and Step-Tr groups were not significantly different, while the Stand-Tr flexion duration was significantly lower relative to both the Step-Tr and Non-Tr groups (B). The average number of flexion responses was not different between groups (D). Data are mean ± S.E.M. *; Significantly different at p < 0.05.