Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov 8;116(2):149–157. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10545

Table 6.

RRs and 95% CIs of the summary estimate, subsets and sensitivity analyses for the association between cryptorchidism and prenatal exposure to estrogenic agents.

Subset of studies No. of studies included Mantel–Haenszel method (fixed effects) χ2p-Value DerSimonian–Laird method (random effects)
All studies 6 1.34 (0.96–1.87) 0.44 1.22 (0.86–1.73)
Excluding DES exposure 3 1.06 (0.70–1.59) 0.95 1.05 (0.70–1.59)
Studies including DES 3 2.09 (1.13–3.86) 0.24 1.80 (0.83–3.93)
Pharmaceutical estrogens 5 1.44 (0.99–2.10) 0.37 1.31 (0.87–1.96)
Pharmaceutical extrogens excluding DES 2 1.10 (0.49–2.49) 1 1.10 (0.49–2.49)
Case–control studies 4 1.45 (0.98–2.15) 0.24 1.38 (0.81–2.34)
Cohort studies 2 1.04 (0.53–2.02) 0.79 1.03 (0.53–2.00)
American studies 4 1.55 (1.00–2.39) 0.24 1.40 (0.82–2.41)
Excluding highest risk ratio 5 1.21 (0.86–1.72) 0.66 1.16 (0.81–1.66)
Excluding lowest risk ratio 5 1.38 (0.97–1.97) 0.34 1.27 (0.86–1.87)
Excluding highest weight 5 1.46 (0.97–2.19) 0.32 1.30 (0.82–2.06)
Excluding lowest weight 5 1.21 (0.86–1.72) 0.66 1.16 (0.81–1.66)
Excluding studies with quality score < 30 4 1.25 (0.86–1.80) 0.53 1.19 (0.82–1.73)
Excluding studies with quality score < 35 3 1.06 (0.70–1.59) 0.95 1.05 (0.70–1.59)