. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2007 Oct 26;44(1):180–187. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.09.009

Table 3.

Echocardiographic data

	IVSd	IVSs	LVPWd	LVPWs	LVIDd	LVIDs
Sham (n=8)	1.7(0.2)	2.6(0.4)	1.7(0.5)	2.5(0.3)	6.8(0.5)	4.2(0.5)
MI (n=7)	1.9(0.3)	2.4(0.7)	1.8(0.5)	2.5(0.7)	7.1(0.5)	5.2(0.9)^†
MI+T3 (n=9)	1.8(0.2)	2.2(0.6)	1.9(0.4)	2.5(0.2)	7.1(0.5)	5.5(0.5)^‡

Data presented as means (SD).

IVSd and IVSs = interventricular septal thickness in end diastole and systole, respectively, mm; PWTd and PWTs = diastolic and systolic posterior wall thickness, respectively, mm; LVIDd and LVIDs = left ventricular diastolic and systolic internal diameter, respectively, mm;

^†

P ≤ 0.05,

^‡

P ≤ 0.01 vs. Sham operated rats; ANOVA with Student-Newman-Keuls’ Multiple Comparison Test.