Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuroimmunol. 2007 Nov 26;193(1-2):161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.10.010

Table 5.

IFNγ/IL-5 Ratios a

Controls
MS Patients
Stimulus
C M
C F
P-value
MS M
MS F
P-valueb
Candida 5.8 3.0 NS 1.1 14.4 <.0001c
Diphtheria 6.3 4.7 NS 1.2 6.0 NS
Streptokinase 8.5 5.4 NS 2.3 6.7 <.0001
Tetanus tox. 1.2 1.5 NS 2.8 2.4 NS
TT 830−844 0.9 5.0 <.0001 2.5 10.3 <.0001
TT 947−967 2.5 2.7 NS 1.5 9.9 <.0001
anti-CD3 7.2 6.6 NS 5.2 7.1 <.0001
PHA 7.3 6.1 NS 5.4 8.9 <.0001
MBP 13.3 8.7 NS 12.0 13.9 NS
MBP 87−106 1.2 0.6 NS 0.5 1.3 NS
MOG 1−22 2.5 4.8 NS 0.7 1.5 NS
MOG 34−56 9.4 2.2 NS 1.5 6.5 0.0148
MOG 64−96 8.1 3.0 NS 1.2 8.3 <.0001
PLP-10 0.1 1.8 NS 9.9 0.8 NS
PLP-50 0.9 3.2 NS 1.2 0.5 NS
PLP 40−60 0.8 2.2 NS 0.5 27.8 <.0001
PLP 89−106 8.8 0.9 NS 1.7 2.1 NS
PLP 103−120 0.6 6.8 0.0010 6.2 10.2 NS
PLP 139−158 0.5 2.3 NS 2.6 2.8 NS
PLP 172−191 0.5 2.4 NS 2.5 5.5 0.0100
PLP 195−206 0.5 7.1 0.0005 1.4 21.8 <.0001
a

Ratios are the mean IFNγ response divided by the mean IL-5 response for all subjects in that group.

b

P values were calculated using a bootstrap analysis.

c

P values in bold represent IFNγ/IL-5 ratios where the female ratio is significantly increased compared to the male ratio (P ≤ .01) by a one-way students' T test. NS = not significant.