TABLE 2.
Comparison of HRV real-time RT-PCR assay to reference assays for detection of HRV and HEV in clinical specimensc
Virus detected | No. of samples | Results by the CDC HRV real-time RT-PCR
|
Results from laboratory:
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aa
|
Bb
|
||||||||||
HRV real-time RT-PCR
|
HEV real-time RT-PCR
|
Gel (HRV)
|
HEV real-time RT-PCR
|
||||||||
Pos | Neg | Pos | Neg | Pos | Neg | Pos | Neg | Pos | Neg | ||
HRV | 87 | 87 | 0 | 54 | 33 | 1 | 86 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 87 |
HEV | 24 | 4 | 20 | 0 | 24 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 3 |
The in-house assays used by laboratory A were hydrolysis probe real-time RT-PCR assays for HRV and HEV.
The in-house assay used by laboratory B for HEV was a hydrolysis probe real-time RT-PCR assay. HEV-negative samples that subsequently yielded an appropriately sized band following gel electrophoresis were considered positive for HRV.
Pos, positive; neg, negative.