Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 19;46(2):796–799. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01435-07

TABLE 1.

Direct susceptibility testing by MGMT assay and comparison with indirect proportional method in the same clinical specimens

M. tuberculosis straina No. of strains with the following test result:b
% Agreement
Susceptible by both methods Resistant by both methods Sensitive by MG, resistant by LJ No growth by MG, sensitive by LJ
Susceptible strains (n = 26) 21 5 80
MDR strains (resistant to INH and RF)
    Susceptible to all second-line drugs (n = 3) 3
    Resistant to SM also (n = 1) 1 100
    Resistant to SM, ETB, and AM also (n = 2) 2
    Resistant to SM and KAN also (n = 1) 1
    Resistant to ETB and PAZ also (n = 1) 1
XDR strains resistant to INH, RF, CIP, OF, KAN, AM, ETH, and DC (n = 2) 2 100
Strains with other resistance patterns
    Resistant to only ETB (n = 2) 1 1 66
    Resistant to ETB and SM (n = 3) 2 1
    Resistant to ETB, RF, and AM (n = 1) 1
a

Abbreviations: AM, ampicillin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; DC, doxycycline; ETB, ethambutol; ETH, erythromycin; INH, isonizid; KAN, kanamycin; OF, ofloxacin; PAZ, pyrazinamide; RF, rifampin; SM, streptomycin.

b

MG, malachite green microtube susceptibility assay; LJ, Löwenstein-Jensen culture medium.