Table 6.
Externalizing Problemsa | Internalizing Problemsa | Failing Gradesb | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Close to both fathers (B) | −.40a*** | −.37a*** | −.54a*** | −.31a** | −.83a*** | −.98a** |
Close only to stepfather (SF) | −.36a*** | −.31ab*** | −.33b*** | −.20ab† | −.55a* | −.59a* |
Close only to nonresident father (F) | −.12b | −.11b | −.12b | −.03b | −.59a* | −.63a* |
Close to neither father (N) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Blackc | −.07 | −.04 | .20 | |||
Hispanicc | .34* | −.05 | .56 | |||
Otherc | .09 | −.03 | .15 | |||
Male | .25*** | −.34*** | .66** | |||
Age | .05** | .06*** | .07 | |||
Nonmarital birth | .08 | −.04 | −.34 | |||
Immigrant family | −.20 | .07 | −.21 | |||
Income | .02 | −.01 | −.12 | |||
Mother college | −.01 | −.11 | −.62** | |||
Nonresident father college | −.18* | .13 | −.23 | |||
Stepfather college | −.13 | −.18** | −.38 | |||
Years since lived with father | −.01 | −.02** | −.02 | |||
Contact with father | .01 | −.01 | .01 | |||
Closeness to mother | .03 | −.14** | .08 | |||
Mother-stepfather happiness | −.04* | −.03 | −.02 | |||
Differencesd | B, SF > F, N | B > F, N; SF > N | B > SF, F, N; SF > N | B > F, N; SF > N | B, SF, F > N | B, SF, F > N |
n | 1,146 | 1,146 | 1,149 | 1,149 | 1,112 | 1,112 |
R2 | .05 | .14 | .07 | .18 |
Note: For each closeness group, coefficients within a column that do not share subscripts differ at p < .05. Dummy variables indicating missing or unknown values for income, nonresident father's education, stepfather's education, nonmarital birth, and mother-stepfather marital happiness are also in the model, but coefficients are not shown. All values are weighted except n.
Ordinary least-squares regression.
Logistic regression.
Omitted category is White.
Significant differences at p ≤ .05 between groups on well-being summarized.
p = .05.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.