Table 3.

Summary of univariate effects from HLM analyses for predicting CVCT response rates in Rwanda and Zambia

	Rwanda			Zambia
	OR	95% CI	p	OR	95% CI	p
Couple/Invitation Level Predictors
Years cohabiting	1.011	0.996 – 1.026	0.141	1.03	1.017 – 1.043	< .001
Number of children	0.991	0.941 – 1.043	0.725	1.005	0.958 – 1.055	0.83
Age of man	1.01	1.009 – 1.011	0.057	1.017	1.008 – 1.026	< .001
Age of woman	1.008	0.996 – 1.021	0.183	1.017	1.007 – 1.027	0.002
Place of invitation*
Couple Home vs. Community	1.318	0.944 – 1.839	0.104	1.432	1.047 – 1.958	0.025
INA Home vs. Community	3.546	2.281 – 5.524	< .001	3.248	2.212 – 4.769	< .001
Workplace vs. Community	1.792	1.225 – 2.621	0.003	1.583	1.104 – 2.269	0.013
Person(s) invited
Couple vs. Woman	1.559	1.215 – 1.999	0.001	1.918	1.531 – 2.402	< .001
Man vs. Woman	1.324	1.053 – 1.665	0.017	1.218	0.983 – 1.510	0.071
Relationship to INA
Family member vs. Just met	1.503	0.738 – 3.060	0.262	1.984	1.320 – 2.982	0.001
Friend/Social/Professional vs. Just met	1.263	1.015 – 1.573	0.036	1.917	1.495 – 2.458	< .001
Public endorsement	1.535	1.067 – 2.207	0.021	1.435	0.942 – 2.185	0.092
INA level Predictors
Religious vs . Private	1.536	0.355 – 6.659	0.551	1.278	0.559 – 2.922	0.549
NGO/CBO vs . Private	0.966	0.237 – 4.070	0.961	2.09	0.821 – 5.319	0.117
Health vs. Private	0.867	0.247 – 3.048	0.817	1.052	0.438 – 2.520	0.907
Gender (M = 1, F = 0)	2.48	0.912 – 6.742	0.07	0.976	0.512 – 1.861	0.94
Age of INA	1.014	0.966 – 1.050	0.572	0.996	0.967 – 1.027	0.806
Married (Y = 1, N = 0)	1.135	0.403 – 3.198	0.803	1.211	0.535 – 2.742	0.635
INA HIV tested (Y = 1, N = 0)	0.923	0.331 – 2.575	0.874	0.633	0.333 – 1.205	0.157

*Workplace = Clinic and Workplace

Community = Church, Market, Social Gathering, and Other