Table 4.

Summary of effects from multi-predictor HLM analyses for predicting CVCT response rates- Rwanda and Zambia

	Rwanda			Zambia
	OR	95% CI	p	OR	95% CI	p
Couple/Invitation Level Predictors
Age of man	1.013	1.006 – 1.024	0.015	1.017	1.007 – 1.025	< .001
Location of invitation*
Couple Home vs. Community	1.262	0.902 – 1.764	0.200	1.596	1.135 – 2.243	0.008
INA Home vs. Community	3.398	2.150 – 5.368	< .001	3.267	2.174 – 4.909	< .001
Workplace vs. Community	1.788	1.209 – 2.644	0.004	1.671	1.143 – 2.443	0.008
Person(s) invited
Couple vs. Woman	1.638	1.253 – 2.142	0.001	1.733	1.363 – 2.202	< .001
Man vs. Woman	1.213	0.940 – 1.566	0.137	1.059	0.841 – 1.334	0.623
Relationship to INA
Family member vs. Just met	1.760	0.844 – 3.672	0.131	1.698	1.110 – 2.599	0.015
Social acquaint. vs. Just met	1.070	0.842 – 1.358	0.581	1.810	1.395 – 2.347	< .001
Public endorsement	1.756	1.140 – 2.708	0.011	1.705	1.075 – 2.704	0.023

*Workplace = Clinic and Workplace

Community = Church, Market, Social Gathering, and Other