Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Feb 13.
Published in final edited form as: Assessment. 2005 Sep;12(3):270–289. doi: 10.1177/1073191105277110

TABLE 3.

Results of Common Factor Analyses of Antisocial Process Screening Device Items

Three-Factor
Two-Factor
Varimax
Procrustes
Varimax
Procrustes
Item Number A B C A B C A B A B
1 .51 .16 .07 .40 .08 .34 .48 .06 .49 .15
2 .09 .51 .05 .39 .09 .34 .10
3 .09 −.06 .47 −.01 .49 .07 .02 .46 −.02 .46
4 .38 .20 −.04 .21 .00 .38 .42 −.04 .42 .03
5 .31 .18 .21 .30 .22 .18 .35 .22 .29 .27
6 .18 .66 .17 .55 .21
7 .19 −.10 −.15 −.12 −.14 .15 .21 −.15
8 .51 .06 .05 .35 .07 .35 .42 .04 .45 .12
9 .27 .24 −.06 .22 −.04 .27 .37 −.05 .34 −.01
10 .24 .52 .17 .96 .01 −.25 .52 .21
11 .32 .29 .05 .34 .07 .25 .44 .06 .43 .13
12 .02 .21 .54 .21 .50 −.06 .14 .55 .04 .53
13 .09 .58 −.07 .34 −.08 .13 .43 −.01 .38 −.01
14 .34 .38 .16 .38 .18 .28 .51 .18 .46 .25
15 .50 .15 −.11 .23 −.06 .51 .47 −.11 .53 −.03
16 .61 .11 .18 .39 .19 .43 .51 .16 .54 .24
17 .31 .01 −.01 .11 .00 .31 .24 −.02
18 .06 .03 .80 .14 .83 −.08 .04 .80 −.06 .85
19 .29 .26 .00 .28 .03 .25 .40 .01 .36 .08
20 −.05 .02 .28 .06 .22 −.10 −.03 .29 −.07 .23

NOTE: Factor loadings greater than .4 are in bold. Loadings less than .4 that represent the strongest loading of each item on any factor are in italics.