Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 1;9(5):R64. doi: 10.1186/bcr1770

Table 2.

Concordance between PathVysion and other HER2-testing protocols

Comparison with PathVysion κ coefficient* Degree of agreement Agreement (percentage) Sensitivity (percentage) Specificity (percentage)
PharmDx 1.000 Excellent 100 100 100
INFORM (at least six signals per nucleus) 0.916 ± 0.058 Excellent 98 100 94
INFORM (at least five signals per nucleus) 0.799 ± 0.085 Good 91 100 88
INFORM (more than four signals per nucleus) 0.532 ± 0.111 Moderate 76 100 57
CISH (at least six signals per nucleus) 0.876 ± 0.070 Excellent 94 100 94
CISH (at least five signals per nucleus) 0.762 ± 0.091 Good 89 100 88
In-house IHC (positive 3+, negative 0, 1+, 2+) 0.792 ± 0.089 Good 91 89 91
In-house IHC (positive 3+, 2+, negative 0, 1+) 0.475 ± 0.111 Moderate 72 100 57
HercepTest (positive 3+, negative 0, 1+, 2+) 0.645 ± 0.104 Good 83 89 80
HercepTest (positive 3+, 2+, negative 0, 1+) 0.350 ± 0.119 Poor 64 94 49

HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; CISH, chromogenic in situ hybridisation; IHC, immunohistochemistry. (* errors given as ± SD)