Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Biol Chem. 2007 Jul 6;282(38):28117–28125. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703121200

Table 2.

Catalytic comparison between WT and H162D mutant of hITPK1

Substrate Reaction WT H162D
Ins(1,4,5)P3 Phosphorylation 0.026 ± 0.001 0.0113 ± 0.003
Ins(1,3,4)P3 Phosphorylation 671 ± 60 3.3 ± 0.4
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 Phosphorylation 309 ± 57 43 ± 7
Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 Dephosphorylation 53 ± 3.3 135 ± 13
Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 Dephosphorylation:-fold effect of Ins(1,3,4)P3 2.9 ± 0.4 0.96 ± 0.04
[32P]-Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 Phosphate transfer: InsP4 / ATP 31 0.31

Assays were performed as described in the Methods Section. The units for the kinase reactions are 10³ × k (the first-order rate constant) / ng protein. Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 dephosphorylation is measured as nmoles /mg protein / min. The effect of Ins(1,3,4)P3 upon Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 dephosphorylation is calculated as a ratio: plus Ins(1,3,4)P3 / minus Ins(1,3,4)P3. The values for “phosphate transfer” are the ratios of [32P]-labeled InsP4 vs ATP, formed after either enzyme dephosphorylated approximately 50% of 5 µM [32P-1]-Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 substrate, in the presence of 5 µM Ins(1,3,4)P3 (e.g. see Fig. 1B).