Table 2.

Morphological and genetic assignment for individuals that exhibited intermediate characters or a combination of characters of different species.

Indv.	Morphological assignment		cpDNA haplotype	Genetic assignment
	Pubescence	Leaf morphology		'robur'	'pubescens'	'petraea'	'frainetto'
68	Q. robur s.l.	Q. robur	6	0.16	0.81	0.02	0.01
24	Q. pubescens s.l.	Q. robur	5a	0.26	0.29	0.44	0.01
67	Q. pubescens s.l.	Q. robur	5a	0.54	0.43	0.02	0.01
249	Q. pubescens s.l.	Q. robur	5a	0.97	0.02	0.01	0.01
64	Q. petraea s.s.	Q. robur	5a	0.96	0.02	0.01	0.01
5	Q. pubescens s.l.	Q. pubescens	5a	0.88	0.08	0.03	0.01
27	Q. pubescens s.l.	Q. pubescens	5a	0.60	0.29	0.06	0.05
54	Q. pubescens s.l.	Q. pubescens	6	0.06	0.01	0.05	0.88
124	Q. pubescens s.l.	Q. pubescens	5a	0.04	0.18	0.75	0.04
128	Q. pubescens s.l.	Q. pubescens	5a	0.01	0.02	0.95	0.02
118	Q. robur-Q. petraea s.l.	Q. petraea	6	0.36	0.03	0.58	0.03
66	Q. frainetto s.s.	Q. pubescens	5a	0.01	0.96	0.01	0.03
107	Q. frainetto s.s.	Q. pubescens	5a	0.02	0.03	0.06	0.89
3	Q. petraea s.l.	Q. petraea	6	0.01	0.02	0.97	0.01
200	Q. robur s.l.	Q. robur	5a	0.96	0.01	0.01	0.02
321	Q. frainetto s.l.	Q. frainetto	5a	0.01	0.03	0.02	0.95

The morphological classification was based on pubescence and leaf morphology, respectively. The genetic assignment used a Bayesian method implemented in the program STRUCTURE. Individual's probability of belonging to each 'species' cluster is shown. s.s. – sensu stricto; s.l. – sensu lato.