Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2007 Aug;33(2 Suppl):S130–S143. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.011

Table 3.

Correlations between study method characteristics and aggressive/disruptive behavior effect sizes for universal programs (N=77)

Method Variable Correlation
Teacher reported outcome measure 0.07
Self-reported outcome measure -0.23**
Number of items in outcome measure -0.19*
Timing of measurement -0.02
Cluster random assignment -0.07
Non-random assignment 0.07
Pretest adjustment -0.13
ES calculated with means/sds (vs. all other methods) -0.05
Degree of estimation in ES calculation -0.02
Attrition (% loss) -0.13
Number of ES aggregated -0.08

Note: weighted random effects analysis

*

p<0.10

**

p<0.05