Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov 14;9(6):R119. doi: 10.1186/ar2327

Table 5.

Sensitivity and specificity of US, x-ray, and clinical examination, with MRI as the standard reference method

US sensitivity US specificity X-ray sensitivity X-ray specificity Clinical examination sensitivity Clinical examination specificity
Bone erosions
 MCP joint 0.56 0.93 0.38 0.99 NA NA
 PIP joint 0.57 0.88 0.40 0.95 NA NA
 DIP joint 0.00 0.99 0.67 0.97 NA NA
Bone proliferations
 MCP joint 0.00 0.97 0.00 0.96 NA NA
 PIP joint 0.50 0.96 0.00 0.96 NA NA
 DIP joint 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 NA NA
Synovitis
 MCP joint 0.70 0.88 NA NA 0.31 0.74
 PIP joint 0.50 0.88 NA NA 0.25 0.76
 DIP joint 0.40 0.87 NA NA 0.00 0.83
Tenosynovitis
 MCP joint 0.38 0.99 NA NA NA NA
 PIP joint 1.00 0.86 NA NA NA NA
 DIP joint 0.67 0.98 NA NA NA NA
Insertional changes
 Extensor tendons 0.50 0.96 NA NA NA NA
 Flexor tendons 1.00 0.95 NA NA NA NA
Capsular/extracapsular changes 1.00 0.88 NA NA NA NA

The imaging modalities were ultrasonography (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), projection radiography (x-ray), and clinical examination. DIP, distal interphalangeal; MCP, metacarpophalangeal; NA, not applicable; PIP, proximal interphalangeal.