Skip to main content
editorial
. 2008 Feb;9(2):119–123. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.2008.4

Table 1.

Applying this framework: a few examples from academic medicine

Examples Shared primary interests? Divergence and required regulations? Applicability? Disclosure?
Research on passive smoking with tobacco industry funding No Although this industry might assert an aim of finding out the truth, they have no interest that this truth be known → Fails at step one    
Phase III clinical trial run by an academic hospital with pharmaceutical funding Yes Knowing efficacy and risks of a new drug Yes Regulations often identifiable Usually, yes Will depend on the context Independent review by IRBs Yes At publication as part of the methods
Pharmaceutical representatives to help physicians keep up with new information No If primary interest of the industry is to improve financial margins → Fails at step one    
  Yes If primary interest of the industry is to improve patient access to beneficial drugs Yes Regulations often identifiable No Unclear threshold involved, independent review not applicable → Fails at step three
Pharmaceutical industry funding of continuing education No If primary interest of the industry is to improve financial margins → Fails at step one    
  Yes If primary interest of the industry is keeping physicians knowledgeable of recent innovation Yes Regulations often identifiable Usually, yes Will depend on the context Yes During educational intervention, as part of the methods
Clinical investigator whose spouse holds shares in the company Yes Strictly speaking, there is no partnership involved in the decision that could be affected Will depend crucially on the sort of decision that is contemplated    

IRBs, independent review boards.