Table 1.
Applying this framework: a few examples from academic medicine
| Examples | Shared primary interests? | Divergence and required regulations? | Applicability? | Disclosure? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research on passive smoking with tobacco industry funding | No Although this industry might assert an aim of finding out the truth, they have no interest that this truth be known | → Fails at step one | ||
| Phase III clinical trial run by an academic hospital with pharmaceutical funding | Yes Knowing efficacy and risks of a new drug | Yes Regulations often identifiable | Usually, yes Will depend on the context Independent review by IRBs | Yes At publication as part of the methods |
| Pharmaceutical representatives to help physicians keep up with new information | No If primary interest of the industry is to improve financial margins | → Fails at step one | ||
| Yes If primary interest of the industry is to improve patient access to beneficial drugs | Yes Regulations often identifiable | No Unclear threshold involved, independent review not applicable | → Fails at step three | |
| Pharmaceutical industry funding of continuing education | No If primary interest of the industry is to improve financial margins | → Fails at step one | ||
| Yes If primary interest of the industry is keeping physicians knowledgeable of recent innovation | Yes Regulations often identifiable | Usually, yes Will depend on the context | Yes During educational intervention, as part of the methods | |
| Clinical investigator whose spouse holds shares in the company | Yes Strictly speaking, there is no partnership involved in the decision that could be affected | Will depend crucially on the sort of decision that is contemplated |
IRBs, independent review boards.