Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Feb 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Biol Chem. 2005 Apr 25;280(26):24293–24300. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M502588200

TABLE I. Light response parameters of WT and Palm−/−.

Values given as mean ± S.E. (n). The current circulating in darkness was given by the amplitude of the response to a saturating flash. Single photon response amplitude was estimated by dividing the ensemble variance by the mean response amplitude. Kinetics were determined from dim flash responses whose amplitudes were a fifth of the maximum. Time to peak was measured from mid-flash to the response peak. Integration time was calculated as the integral of the response divided by response amplitude. i½ and I½ are the light strengths giving rise to half-maximal flash and step responses, respectively. Comparisons were made using a t test. ns, not significant.

  WT Palm−/− p
Circulating current, pA 8.8 ± 0.3 (59) 8.8 ± 0.2 (95) ns
Single photon response      
  Amplitude, pA 0.53 ± 0.08 (5) 0.43 ± 0.04 (10) ns
  Time to peak, ms 128 ± 3 (43) 128 ± 3 (75) ns
  Integration time, ms 335 ± 17 (43) 252 ± 9 (75) <0.0001
Sensitivity to flashes, i½, photons µm−2 46 ± 2 (58) 52 ± 2 (95) <0.01
Sensitivity to steps, I½, photons µm−2 s−1 120 ± 11 (8) 238 ± 30 (14) <0.01