Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 11.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2007 Sep 2;187(1):48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.08.036

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A. Nac1 mutant mice and wild-type mice exhibit significant cocaine-conditioned place preference. The left side of the graph indicates that no initial preference for either side of the testing box exists for any of the groups. The right side of the graph shows that both mutant and wild-type mice show a preference for the side of the testing box that was paired with 10 mg/kg cocaine. There is no significant genotype effect * p < 0.05 from corresponding saline group (n = 6 per group). (ANOVA; Fisher's PLSD post hoc test). B. Nac1 mutant mice and wild-type mice exhibit significant amphetamine-conditioned place preference. The left side of the graph indicates that no initial preference for either side of the testing box exists for any of the groups. The right side of the graph shows that both mutant mice and wild-type mice show a preference for the side of the testing box that was paired with 2 mg/kg amphetamine. There is no significant difference between the amphetamine-treated Nac1 mutant mice and the wild-type mice. * p < 0.05 from corresponding saline group (n = 6 per group). (ANOVA; Fisher's PLSD post hoc test).