Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 8;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-5

Table 6.

SES differences in perceptions of ease of receiving treatment for malaria from providers

Inyi Udi Oji Nachi
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Traditional healer
Q1: most poor 42 (29) 34 (33) 14 (21) 109 (35)
Q2:average 58 (39) 40 (39) 27 (40) 104 (33)
Q3: least poor 47 (32) 29 (28) 26 (39) 98 (32)
Chi square (p-value) 4.6 (0.1) 2.4 (0.3) 6.0 (.051) 8.6 (0.01)
Concentration index 0.02 -0.03 0.13 -0.10

Private hospital
Q1: most poor 66 (31) 67 (33) 35 (19) 20 (25)
Q2:average 75 (35) 64 (32) 82 (43) 26 (32)
Q3: least poor 74 (34) 72 (35) 72 (38) 35 (43)
Chi square (p-value) 1.8 (0.4) 1.5 (0.5) 42.7 (.0001) 6.2 (0.04)
Concentration index 0.02 0.01 0.14 0.07

Public hospital
Q1: most poor 27 (27) 53 (30) 54 (23) 6 (30)
Q2:average 43 (43) 63 (36) 95 (40) 6 (30)
Q3: least poor 29 (29) 59 (34) 88 (37) 8 (40)
Chi square (p-value) 6.3 (0.04) 1.9 (0.4) 39.1 (.0001) 0.5 (0.8)
Concentration index 0.02 0.03 0.10 0.07

Patent medicine dealers
Q1: most poor 82 (32) 100 (34) 57 (25) 96 (32)
Q2:average 89 (34) 97 (33) 84 (37) 101 (34)
Q3: least poor 88 (34) 98 (33) 85 (38) 100 (34)
Chi square (p-value) 1.3 (0.5) 0.5 (0.8) 20.7 (.0001) 3.4 (0.2)
Concentration index 0.02 -0.01 0.17 0.02

Community-health workers
Q1: most poor 36 (26) 8 (32) 11 (25) 28 (35)
Q2:average 51 (37) 6 (24) 18 (41) 30 (38)
Q3: least poor 51 (37) 11 (44) 15 (34) 21 (27)
Chi square (p-value) 5.5 (0.07) 1.7 (0.4) 1.8 (0.40) 2.0 (0.4)
Concentration index 0.00 0.08 0.07 -0.04

Health centre
Q1: most poor 38 (28) 39 (34) 26 (44) 55 (55)
Q2:average 47 (34) 41 (35) 15 (25) 28 (28)
Q3: least poor 52 (38) 36 (31) 18 (31) 17 (17)
Chi square (p-value) 3.8 (0.2) 0.4 (0.8) 4.0 (0.14) 31.7 (0.01)
Concentration index 0.06 -0.02 -0.08 -0.25