Table 1.
• Underlying methodology | |
A | RCT |
B | Downgraded RCT or upgraded observational studies |
C | Well-done observational studies |
D | Case series or expert opinion |
• Factors that may decrease the strength of evidence | |
1. | Poor quality of planning and implementation of available RCTs suggesting high likelihood of bias |
2. | Inconsistency of results (including problems with subgroup analyses) |
3. | Indirectness of evidence (differing population, intervention, control, outcomes, comparison) |
4. | Imprecision of results |
5. | High likelihood of reporting bias |
• Main factors that may increase the strength of evidence | |
1. | Large magnitude of effect (direct evidence, relative risk (RR) > 2 with no plausible confounders) |
2. | Very large magnitude of effect with RR > 5 and no threats to validity (by two levels) |
3. | Dose response gradient |
RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, relative risk