Table 2.
Factors Determining Strong vs. Weak Recommendation
| What should be considered | Recommended Process |
|---|---|
| Quality of evidence | The lower the quality of evidence the less likely a strong recommendation |
| Relative importance of the outcomes | If values and preferences vary widely, a strong recommendation becomes less likely |
| Baseline risks of outcomes | The higher the risk, the greater the magnitude of benefit |
| Magnitude of relative risk including benefits, harms, and burden | Larger relative risk reductions or larger increases in relative risk of harm make a strong recommendation more or less likely respectively |
| Absolute magnitude of the effect | The larger the absolute benefits and harms, the greater or lesser likelihood respectively of a strong recommendation |
| Precision of the estimates of the effects | The greater the precision the more likely is a strong recommendation |
| Costs | The higher the cost of treatment, the less likely a strong recommendation |