Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2007 Oct 25;42(2):396–404. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.10.010

Table 4.

Whole cross-section averages for microstructural and remodeling properties indicate decreased turnover with balanced formation and resorption in hibernating grizzly bear femurs. Means with standard deviations in parentheses are presented. See Table 2 for explanations of abbreviations.

Property Active Hibernating p-value
Por (%) 7.6 (0.5) 5.3 (0.4) 0.0008
Rf.Ca.Dn (#/mm2) 0.9 (0.2) 0.4 (0.2) 0.065
Rp.Ca.Dn (#/mm2) 0.3 (0.02) 0.1 (0.03) 0.108
L.On.Dn (#/mm2) 7.0 (3.1) 2.5 (0.8) 0.031
On.MAR (μm/day) 1.1 (0.1) 0.7 (0.1) 0.015
On.MARN (μm/day) 3.4 (1.1) 3.3 (1.5) 0.911
Ac.f (#/mm2/year) 24.6 (11.9) 6.2 (3.3) 0.032
FP (days) 59.7 (16.5) 81.0 (17.6) 0.131