Skip to main content
. 1998 Apr 14;95(8):4458–4462. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4458

Table 1.

Predicted stability of endosymbionts compared with outgroups (ΔG, in kcal/mol)

Taxon Regions of Domain I of 16S rRNA
Total
122 240 65 52 39 27
P. vulgaris −13.9 −8.2 −5.7 −17.2 −14.9 −30.7 −90.6
E. coli −17.0 −12.0 −4.2 −14.3 −14.9 −31.2 −93.6
 Aphid endosymbiont (Sg) −15.0 −7.2 −4.5 −14.3 −11.9 −21.6 −75.6
 Aphid endosymbiont (Sc) −7.8 −0.9 −8.0 −14.3 −11.9 −22.1 −65.0
 Aphid endosymbiont (Mk) −9.6 −7.4 −7.6 −14.3 −11.9 −21.8 −72.6
 Aphid endosymbiont (Mp) −6.8 −7.2 −8.4 −14.3 −11.9 −21.6 −70.2
 Ant endosymbiont −13.3 −8.9 −4.8 −18.3 −15.4 −16.8 −77.5
 Tsetse fly endosymbiont −13.9 −9.4 −7.2 −18.3 −13.3 −24.0 −86.1
O. linum −12.2 −9.6 −7.3 −15.7 −16.8 −28.3 −89.9
 Whitefly endosymbiont −4.0 −6.1 −1.0 −17.2 −15.4 −22.3 −66.0
A. eutrophus −17.2 −9.1 −7.5 −21.2 −15.4 −29.0 −99.4
 Mealybug endosymbiont −9.4 −4.6 −6.0 −21.2 −9.7 −29.4 −80.4
A. tumefaciens −14.3 −11.3 −3.1 −16.4 −17.9 −26.5 −89.5
W. pipientis −0.8 −6.9 −7.9 −15.5 −17.9 −16.7 −65.7

Stabilities calculated separately for six parts of Domain I. Numbers are −ΔG, the change in free energy associated with the structure.