Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr;14(4):1104–1114. doi: 10.1110/ps.041153605

Table 2.

GST crystallographic complexes used in testing the minimal rotation hypothesis

Best ligand RMSD (Å)
No. Binding PDB code Ligand name No. non-H atoms Resolution (Å) Flexible docking Rigid docking
1 B 10gs Benzylcysteine phenylglycine 33 2.2 0.36 0.36
2 B 12gs S-Nonyl-cysteine 29 2.1 0.36 0.62
3 X 13gs Sulfasalazine 28 1.9 1.78 1.78
4 B 18gs 1-(S-Glutathionyl)-2,4-dinitrobenzene 32 1.9 0.61 0.61
5 B 1aqv P-Bromobenzylglutathione 28 1.9 0.37 0.37
6 P 1aqw Glutathione 20 1.8 0.46 0.54
7 B 1aqx S-(2,3,6-Trinitrophenyl)cysteine 35 2.0 0.78 0.93
8 B 1pgt S-Hexylglutathione 26 1.8 0.53 0.73
9 X 20gs Cibacron blue 22 2.5 0.52
10 X 2gss Ethacrynic acid 19 1.9 2.48
11 B 2pgt (9R,10R)-9-(S-Glutathionyl)-10-hydroxy9,10dihydrophenanthrene 35 1.9 0.26 1.10
12 B 3gss Ethacrynic acid-glutathione conjugate 39 1.9 0.52 0.52
13 B 3pgt Glutathione conjugate of (+)-Anti-BPDE 43 2.1 0.59

The second column denotes whether the ligand binds in the glutathione/peptidyl (“P”) binding site, the hydrophobic/xenobiotic (“X”) binding site, or extends into both (“B”) sites.