Skip to main content
. 2005 Sep;14(9):2405–2413. doi: 10.1110/ps.051519805

Table 2.

Shotgun-scanning analysis of hGHwtand hGHv

Wild–type/mutant ratiosb
hGHR selection Antibody selection ΔΔGmut–wtc(kcal/mol)
hGHwt hGHv hGHwt hGHv hGHwt hGHv
Residuea Wt/Homo Wt/Ser Wt/Homo Wt/Ser Wt/Homo Wt/Ser Wt/Homo Wt/Ser Homo Ser Homo Ser
M14W 0.91 4.45 1.21 3.13 1.39 7.33 0.022 0.29 −0.3 −0.3 2.4 1.4
H18D 1.89 4.17 1.64 1.08 2.42 13.7 0.96 0.84 −0.2 −0.7 0.3 0.2
H21N 2.33 1.25 6.23 0.12 1.59 1.36 7.45 0.045 0.2 −0.1 −0.1 0.6
Q22 1.42 0.37 2.88 1.64 0.69 0.43 1.85 1.85 0.4 −0.1 0.3 −0.1
F25 1.02 1.31 2.17 1.31 1.71 1.49 1.50 1.24 −0.3 −0.1 0.2 0.0
D26 0.70 3.63 1.04 1.04 1.22 0.94 0.92 1.92 −0.3 0.8 0.1 −0.4
Q29 1.94 0.75 3.52 0.81 0.92 0.72 5.50 0.80 0.4 0.0 −0.3 0.0
K41I 1.35 1.14 1.14 1.23 0.34 0.91 0.53 1.84 0.8 0.1 0.5 −0.2
Y42H 1.04 0.77 1.21 1.22 0.47 0.90 1.09 2.50 0.5 −0.1 0.1 −0.4
S43 0.84 1.21 1.53 0.94 −0.4 0.0
F44 1.57 2.80 0.92 2.20 2.79 2.03 1.09 0.90 −0.3 0.2 0.2 0.5
L45W 3.52 1.26 1.24 1.71 2.00 1.94 0.70 0.54 0.4 −0.3 0.3 0.7
Q46W 4.88 0.40 0.73 1.67 0.54 0.40 0.46 0.82 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.4
N47 1.42 0.74 1.16 0.78 0.49 1.04 0.86 1.02 0.6 −0.2 0.2 −0.2
P48 1.19 0.61 0.53 0.96 0.84 0.84 0.64 1.28 0.2 −0.2 −0.1 −0.2
T60 1.79 0.25 1.76 0.76 0.79 0.17 1.14 0.43 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.3
P61 4.94 9.55 4.59 6.38 0.69 0.57 0.93 0.98 1.2 1.7 1.0 1.1
S62 1.94 1.47 1.33 2.36 0.2 −0.3
N63 1.50 0.86 2.65 0.31 0.32 0.62 1.09 0.63 0.9 0.2 0.5 −0.4
R64K 1.88 7.55 1.02 3.08 2.58 1.61 0.66 0.30 −0.2 0.9 0.3 1.4
E65 0.42 0.38 0.67 0.61 0.45 0.27 0.42 0.47 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2
E66 0.59 0.78 0.67 1.63 0.35 0.40 0.39 0.68 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5
T67 1.50 0.86 3.52 2.20 0.84 0.22 1.47 0.40 0.3 0.8 0.5 1.0
Q68 1.79 0.86 2.65 1.50 1.27 0.42 1.20 0.40 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.8
Y164 1.18 3.13 0.55 5.33 1.00 5.57 0.86 22.3 0.1 −0.3 −0.3 −0.9
R167N 1.32 1.38 9.00 0.38 1.31 0.75 6.15 0.19 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.4
K168 0.51 2.15 0.55 1.20 0.54 1.94 0.98 7.00 0.0 0.1 −0.3 −1.1
D171S 18.3 1.15 2.17 1.44 2.27 1.33 1.5 −0.4 0.3
K172 0.68 11.0 0.86 23.0 0.46 1.38 1.02 0.82 0.2 1.2 −0.1 2.0
E174S 1.00 4.89 0.94 0.41 4.45 0.82 0.5 0.1 0.1
T175 1.05 4.94 1.64 1.09 0.63 1.09 0.58 0.23 0.3 0.9 0.6 0.9
F176Y 2.25 46.5 0.79 46.0 2.32 3.50 0.52 6.15 0.0 1.5 0.3 1.2
R178 2.37 3.32 1.26 17.8 2.57 0.93 2.58 4.35 0.0 0.8 −0.4 0.8
I179T 0.43 3.23 2.24 3.04 0.56 1.00 2.00 0.71 −0.2 0.7 0.1 0.9
R183 0.69 4.53 9.56 9.33 1.00 1.00 6.15 0.034 −0.2 0.9 0.3 3.3

aThe 35 residues included in the analysis are listed. The first letter denotes the hGHwt sequence in the single-letter amino acid code, followed by the position number in the hGH sequence. In positions where the hGHv sequence differs from that of hGHwt the letter following the position number denotes the hGHv sequence (e.g., M14W denotes position 14, which is methionine in hGHwt and tryptophan in hGHv).

b Wild-type/mutant ratios were calculated from ~100 sequences selected for binding to either the hGHR-ECD or an anti-hGH monoclonal antibody. Values significantly different from unity (≥4.0 or ≤0.25) are highlighted in bold.

cThe wild-type/mutant ratios were used to calculate the difference in binding free energy (ΔΔGmut–wt) corresponding to each serine or homolog mutation as described in Materials and Methods. Binding energy difference values indicating significant deleterious (≥0.4 kcal/mol) or beneficial (≤0.4 kcal/mol) effects are highlighted in bold.