Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 27;3(2):e1689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001689

Table 2. Results of the ANOVAs testing for sex and patch differences in discriminable chromatic (ΔSvar) and achromatic (ΔLvar) variability and corresponding Ordered Heterogeneity tests testing for a positive relationship between levels of variability and sexual dichromatism.

sex patch sex x patch Ordered heterogeneity tests sexual dichromatism vs. variability
Robin Erithacus rubecula ΔSvar F1,59 = 0.02, p = 0.88 F1,59 = 11.07, p = 0.0015 F1,58 = 0.54, p = 0.46 1)
ΔLvar F1,59 = 0.39, p = 0.546 F1,59 = 1.53, p = 0.22 F1,58 = 0.8, p = 0.389 1)
Blackbird Turdus merula ΔSvar F1,155 = 2.93, p = 0.088 F3,155 = 10.08, p<0.0001 F3,152 = 2.01, p = 0.114 rsPc = 0.99, k = 4, p<0.001
ΔLvar F1,155 = 4. 54, p = 0.0347 F3,155 = 2, p = 0.115 F3,152 = 0.8, p = 0.524 rsPc = −0.70, k = 4, p>0.95
Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla ΔSvar F1,194 = 8.78, p = 0.0034 F2,194 = 3.57, p = 0.026 F2,192 = 2.81, p = 0.062 rsPc = 0.48, k = 3, p>0.05
ΔLvar F1,194 = 2.17, p = 0.142 F2,194 = 2.69, p = 0.070 F2,192 = 2.03, p = 0.331 rsPc = 0.46, k = 3, p>0.1
Great tit Parus major ΔSvar F1,195 = 0.44, p = 0.5 F3,195 = 24.38, p<0.0001 F3,192 = 2.56, p = 0.056 rsPc = −0.39, k = 4, p>0.8
ΔLvar F1,195 = 1.16, p = 0.281 F3,195 = 1.22, p = 0.301 F3,192 = 1.14, p = 0.331 rsPc = 0, k = 4, p = 0.5
Blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus ΔSvar F1,143 = 0.38, p = 0.53 F3,143 = 21.38, p<0.0001 F3,140 = 1.57, p = 0.19 rsPc = 0.39, k = 4, p>0.1
ΔLvar F1,143 = 0.22, p = 0.639 F3,143 = 5.99, p = 0.0007 F3,140 = 1.68, p = 0.172 rsPc = 0.19, k = 4, p>0.2
Greenfinch Carduelis chloris ΔSvar --------- Males: F4,200 = 3.07, p = 0.0173 F4,295 = 4.75, p = 0.001 Males: rsPc = 0.59, k = 5, p<0.05
Females: F4,95 = 10.10, p<0.0001 Females: rsPc = 0.50, k = 5, p>0.05
ΔLvar --------- Males: F4,200 = 5.07, p = 0.0007 F4,295 = 2.85, p = 0.024 Males: rsPc = 0.099, k = 5, p>0.4
Females: F4,95 = 4.87, p = 0.0013 Females: rsPc = 0.49, k = 5, p>0.05

Significant terms are depicted in bold.

1)

Ordered heterogeneity tests were not computed for robins as only two patches were measured. In this case chromatic variability (ΔSvar) was higher for the more sexually dichromatic patch (breast) as indicated by Figure 1A, Table 1, and the significant “patch” factor; this was not the case for achromatic variability (ΔLvar) where there was no significant difference in variability between the two patches (Fig. 1G).