Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar;98(3):520–526. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.110163

TABLE 1—

Sample Descriptive Statistics, by Race/Ethnicity: Filipino American Community Epidemiological Survey, 1998–1999

Filipino-Specific Work Discrimination
Low (n = 968), Mean (SE) or % High (n = 684), Mean (SE) or % Entire Sample (n = 1652), Mean (SE) or %
Age, y 40.17 (.45) 42.06 (.49)** 40.90 (.34)
Women 49.4 46.6 48.3
Married 56.1 66.7*** 60.3
Live in San Francisco 41.3 53.0*** 46.2
US born 18.4 14.8 16.9
Percentage of life in United States 47.95 (.01) 44.27 (.01)* 46.58 (.01)
Education, y 11.99 (.16) 11.95 (.22) 11.92 (.13)
Job category
    Manual 17.1 14.1 14.7
    Trade 10.9 10.9 11.5
    Service 72.0 75.0 73.8
Per capita household income, $
    < 25 000 66.2 70.0 67.8
    25 000–49 999 16.2 15.4 15.9
    50 000–99 999 7.9 6.6 7.3
    ≥ 100 000 9.1 7.4 8.4
    Missing 0.5 0.6 0.5
Daily language
    Filipino 79.2 83.9* 81.1
    English 20.8 16.1 18.9
Immigrated for employmenta 77.2 78.1 77.6
Job concernsb 12.79 (.15) 16.42 (.25)*** 14.26 (.14)
Everyday discriminationc 1.27 (.02) 1.57 (.03)*** 1.39 (.02)
Filipino-specific work discriminationd 3.06 (.04)
Health conditionse .69 (.04) 1.05 (.05)*** .83 (.03)

Note. Filipino-specific work discrimination was measured by 2 survey items on a Likert scale (1 = none at all 4 = high). Scores for the 2 items were summed, resulting in a total score between 2 and 8. Total scores were dichotomized at the median into high and low groups.

aThis included the percentage of immigrants only (n = 810 in low group; n = 561 in high group; n = 1371 for entire sample) and excludes US-born persons.

b10 = low, 40 = high.

c1 = low, 5 = high.

d2 = low, 8 = high.

eFor a full description of the health conditions variable, see “Methods” section.

* P≤.05; **P≤.01; ***P≤.001