Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: Ultrason Imaging. 2006 Oct;28(4):193–210. doi: 10.1177/016173460602800401

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Maximum number of overlapping pushing beams vs. image FOV for conventional and parallel receive ARFI imaging. Data shown are for a curvilinear scanning geometry. Pushing beam densities were held at constant values of 1.78 and 0.45 beams/degree for the conventional and parallel receive simulations, respectively.