Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 24;2:16. doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-2-16

Table 6.

Evaluation on rigid gap motifs on Prosite datasets.

PS entry Motif Total Motifs NumSeqs Abs. Supp Supp Rank IG Pratt LogOdd Zscore
PS00084 HHM..F.C 206 13 10 1 4 54 3 3
PS00927 PGGRF.E.Y.WD.Y 60 32 32 5 2 1 2 2
PS01142 GTLW.G...........L....W 419 5 4 1 3 198 3 3
PS00780 NHT.C.C.TC..HK 30 57 54 8 7 3 9 9
PS00799 C.D..HCCP....C 285 6 5 1 53 91 50 50
PS00987 GKCNN..GHGHNY 106 13 6 1 4 94 3 3
PS00458 P...LGP.C.Y.AA.V.R...HW..P.L.AGA.A.G...K 579 11 11 1 1 1 1 1
PS00506 H.CGGNVGD 41 16 15 14 2 27 2 2

Rm 0.25 0.11 0.0171 0.1096 0.1096

Evaluation of motif ranking results for eight datasets from the Prosite database. For each dataset the number of sequences, the absolute support value (Abs. Supp.) and the number of reported motifs are given. Motifs are ranked with Information-theoretic measures and support (Supp rank). Last row gives the Rm values of each measure, where support obtained the best results.