Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 7;94(6):1954–1970. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.116202

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

The simulations show the impact of different arrestin binding scenarios for the toad rod scenario defined in Table 2. The behavior of the phosphorylation and transducin activation rates are given by Eqs. 48 and 49 with ωλ = ωact = 0.1 and Np = 6. In the optimal scenario, arrestin binds only when rhodopsin is fully phosphorylated and the rate is given by Eq. 50. In the exp. scenario, the arrestin binding rates increase twofold with each phosphorylation step according to μn = 1.8 s−1 e−0.7(n–1) for n < N and μN = 0. In the linear scenario, the arrestin biding rates increase linearly according to μn = (Nn) 0.3 s−1. The arrestin binding rates are chosen such that in each scenario they reach the final value μ1 = 1.8 s−1. For the (optimal, exp., linear) scenarios, the rates λN and kact(N) are given by (3.2, 2.05, 0.9) s−1 and (245, 237, 227) s−1.