Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Oct 17;69(1-3):165–195. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.015

Table 2.

Table 2: Acceptability with Advance Directives, Stratified by Literacy and Language

Ease of Use & Understanding nine items Usefulness in Decisions/Discussions eight items Value in Care Planning six items
Randomization Randomization Randomization
Redesigned percent* Standard percent P P-I Redesigned percent Standard percent P P-I Redesigned percent Standard percent P P-I
Literacy
Limited 65.2 32.8 <.001 .008 86.6 65.2 .003 .07 87.9 71.5 .01 .03
Adequate 71.5 59.2 .008 90.0 83.0 .11 84.7 83.3 .73
Language
Spanish 70.3 48.7 .002 .86 90.2 83.3 .25 .37 87.6 86.4 .81 .28
English 68.6 48.7 <.001 87.9 73.2 .003 85.2 75.8 .03
*

Numbers reflect percent of scale items with affirmative responses

Represent the P-value calculated between groups, adjusted for age and prior history of helping another person fill out an advance directive.

P for Interaction assessed the interaction between literacy and randomization and language and randomization for each outcome

Number of participants in each group:
  • Participants with limited literacy assigned to redesigned advance directive, n= 41 and assigned to the standard, n= 41
  • Participants with adequate literacy assigned to redesigned advance directive, n=62 and assigned to the standard, n=61
  • Spanish-speaking participants assigned to redesigned advance directive, n=33 and assigned to the standard, n=27
  • English-speaking participants assigned to redesigned advance directive, n=70 and assigned to the standard, n=75