TABLE 1.
COMPARISON OF VISUAL FIELD FINDINGS IN HIGH-CD4 AND LOW-CD4 GROUPS DETECTED BY SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE (SVM) AND RELEVANCE VECTOR MACHINE (RVM)*
| HIGH CD4
|
LOW CD4
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VISUAL FIELD | SVM | RVM | SVM | RVM |
| Top 10 field locations | 0.708 ± 0.056 | 0.704 ± 0.056 | 0.843 ± 0.043 | 0.870 ± 0.038 |
| Top 12 field locations | 0.837 ± 0.045 | 0.824 ± 0.048 | ||
| Top 22 field locations | 0.695 ± 0.056 | 0.726 ± 0.053 | ||
| All 52 field locations | 0.683 ± 0.057 | 0.670 ± 0.060 | 0.804 ± 0.052 | 0.800 ± 0.054 |
| Chance | 0.500 ± 0.062 | 0.500 ± 0.062 | 0.500 ± 0.064 | 0.500 ± 0.064 |
*
Values are expressed as area under ROC curve ± SD. Best performance is shown in bold type.