TABLE 1.
ABSOLUTE AGREEMENT IN PLUS DISEASE DIAGNOSIS AMONG 22 EXPERTS REVIEWING 34 IMAGES*
| 2-LEVEL CATEGORIZATION BY 22 EXPERTS, N (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| IMAGE | Plus | Not plus | |
| 1 | 3 (13.6%) | 19 (86.4%) | |
| 2 | 1 (4.8%) | 20 (95.2%) | |
| 3 | 14 (70.0%) | 6 (30.0%) | |
| 4 | 5 (23.8%) | 16 (76.2%) | |
| 5 | 3 (14.3%) | 18 (85.7%) | |
| 6 | 22 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| 7 | 1 (4.5%) | 21 (95.5%) | |
| 8 | 21 (95.5%) | 1 (4.5%) | |
| 9 | 0 (0.0%) | 21 (100.0%) | |
| 10 | 0 (0.0%) | 22 (100.0%) | |
| 11 | 22 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| 12 | 1 (4.5%) | 21 (95.5%) | |
| 13 | 7 (31.8%) | 15 (68.2%) | |
| 14 | 2 (9.5%) | 19 (90.5%) | |
| 15 | 12 (60.0%) | 8 (40.0%) | |
| 16 | 1 (4.8%) | 20 (95.2%) | |
| 17 | 8 (38.1%) | 13 (61.9%) | |
| 18 | 1 (4.5%) | 21 (95.5%) | |
| 19 | 2 (9.5%) | 19 (90.5%) | |
| 20 | 20 (95.2%) | 1 (4.8%) | |
| 21 | 0 (0.0%) | 21 (100.0%) | |
| 22 | 11 (52.4%) | 10 (47.6%) | |
| 23 | 17 (77.3%) | 5 (22.7%) | |
| 24 | 0 (0.0%) | 22 (100.0%) | |
| 25 | 2 (9.5%) | 19 (90.5%) | |
| 26 | 16 (72.7%) | 6 (27.3%) | |
| 27 | 1 (4.5%) | 21 (95.5%) | |
| 28 | 14 (63.6%) | 8 (36.4%) | |
| 29 | 1 (4.8%) | 20 (95.2%) | |
| 30 | 17 (81.0%) | 4 (19.0%) | |
| 31 | 1 (4.5%) | 21 (95.5%) | |
| 32 | 3 (13.6%) | 19 (86.4%) | |
| 33 | 17 (77.3%) | 5 (22.7%) | |
| 34 | 22 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
*
Findings are displayed based on 2-level categorization (“plus,” “not plus”). Images categorized as “cannot determine” were excluded for that expert.