Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 17;76(3):1186–1192. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01320-07

TABLE 3.

Genes with differing expression in L. major- and L. donovani-infected macrophages

Gene namea NCBI GeneID Fold changeb
L. donovani relative to latexc L. major relative to latexc Expression in L. donovani relative to L. majord
Tdag51/Phlda1 21664 12.6 (0.71) 17.8
Heat shock protein 1B (HSP70) 15511 8.2 (1.8) 4.5
Heat shock protein 1A (HSP72) 193740 15.3 (4.0) 3.8
PARP7 99929 6.2 (1.7) 3.7
Gadd45β 17873 8.0 (2.4) 3.4
Matrix metalloprotease 13 17386 2.4 (0.76) 3.1
RhoB 11852 2.6 (0.84) 3.1
Cox2 19225 10.3 (3.5) 3.0
Ferm domain containing 6 319710 4.4 (1.6) 2.8
Chymase 1 17228 (1.1) (0.43) 2.6
Metallothionein 2 17750 15.5 (6.25) 2.5
Plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 18788 3.0 (1.3) 2.4
Connexin 43 14609 3.3 (1.4) 2.4
P34SEI-1 55942 2.2 (0.92) 2.3
Metallothionein 1 17748 6.3 (2.8) 2.3
Dual-specificity phosphatase 1 19252 2.9 (1.3) 2.3
SSAT 20229 1.8 (0.82) 2.2
RGC32 66214 5.4 (2.5) 2.2
Mitogen-inducible gene 6 74155 (1.7) (0.77) 2.2
Protein phosphatase 2 Cα 19052 2.6 (1.2) 2.2
CCL4 (MIP1β) 20303 4.1 (1.9) 2.2
1190002N15Rik 68861 (1.3) (0.63) 2.0
Kuppel-like factor 4 (Klf4) 16600 2.8 (1.4) 2.0
Tubulin α3B 22147 2.8 (1.4) 2.0
Estrogen-responsive finger protein 217069 (1.7) (0.82) 2.0
Linker for activated T cells (LAT2) 56743 (0.56) (1.2) 0.47
a

Some genes did not show statistically significant differences when macrophages infected with either species were compared with macrophages exposed to latex beads; however, there were significant differences between L. major- and L. donovani-infected macrophages, so they are included in this list.

b

Parentheses indicate changes that were not statistically significant. Probe sets with statistically significantly different signal intensities between L. major and L. donovani macrophages were identified as described in Materials and Methods.

c

Changes relative to macrophages exposed to latex beads are included for context only.

d

Differences between mean signal intensities.