Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 17;76(3):1115–1121. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01300-07

TABLE 1.

Effects of various signal transduction inhibitors on TNF-α− or LPS-induced Stx2 cytotoxicitya

Inhibitor Source Target LPS TNF-α Positive control Reference(s)
Wortmannin EMD Biosciences Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pAkt 33
PKCζ pseudosubstrate Biosource PKCζ 50% ELISA, IL-6 14, 44
PKCι siRNA Dharmacon PKCι PKCι 25
Bay11-7082 EMD Biosciences IκB kinase Cell-based ELISA, ICAM-1 43
SN50 EMD Biosciences NF-κB Cell-based ELISA, ICAM-1 35
SB202190 EMD Biosciences p38 + + NA 19
SB203580 EMD Biosciences p38 + + NA 19
Ebselen EMD Biosciences Traf2/ASK1 ND Toxic 66
SP600125 EMD Biosciences JNK p-c-Jun 30
Jak inhibitor 1 (pyridone 6) EMD Biosciences JAK IRF-1 34, 57
PD98059 Cell Signaling Technology MEK1/2 pERK1/2 42
U0126 EMD Biosciences MEK1/2 pERK1/2 17
Cycloheximide Sigma Aldrich Protein synthesis + + NA 60
a

HUVEC were incubated with the indicated inhibitors for up to 1 h (see Materials and Methods), treated with 200 U/ml TNF-α or 10 μg/ml LPS with the inhibitor for 24 h, and then treated with 1 nM Stx2 for 24 h. CCK-8 or neutral red cell viability assays were performed to determine if an inhibitor protected against TNF-α- or LPS-induced Stx2 cytotoxicity. +, protection; −, inhibitor had no effect; 50%, LPS-induced Stx2 cytotoxicity was reduced by one-half; ND, not determined. The data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Positive controls indicate cellular responses that were modified by identical concentrations of the inhibitors in HUVEC. Supporting data are shown in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material. NA, not applicable.