Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar;10(2):147–153. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.070108

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Quantitative agreement between two different quantification methods: separate analyses of Gt 1 and non-Gt 1 samples. A: Quantitative correlation between CAP TNAI/CTM48 and CAM for Gt 1 samples (n = 49). B: Difference in quantification between CAP TNAI/CTM48 and CAM for Gt 1 samples. Mean, −0.33; SD, 0.24. C: Quantitative correlation between CAP TNAI/CTM48 and CAM for Gt non-1 samples (Gt 2, n = 23; Gt 3, n = 15; Gt 4, n = 11). D: Difference in quantification between CAP TNAI/CTM48 and CAM for non-Gt 1 samples. Mean, −0.22; SD, 0.27. Dashed line in A and C indicates theoretical trend line of complete agreement.