Table 4.
Array removed | lmbr | lmbr_dye | limmaQual | anovaFix | anovaMix | Conditions affected |
1 | 0.9615 | 0.9812 | 0.9623 | 0.9824 | 0.9784 | T2/T3 |
2 | 0.8905 | 0.9277 | 0.8768 | 0.9317 | 0.9431 | T1/T3 |
3 | 0.9606 | 0.8790 | 0.9521 | 0.8951 | 0.8943 | T3/T5 |
4 | 0.9080 | 0.9353 | 0.8821 | 0.9478 | 0.9539 | T4/T1 |
5 | 0.9601 | 0.9632 | 0.9505 | 0.9569 | 0.9592 | T6/T1 |
6 | 0.9773 | 0.9863 | 0.9742 | 0.9852 | 0.9847 | T5/T2 |
7 | 0.9238 | 0.9585 | 0.9317 | 0.9549 | 0.9662 | T5/T6 |
8 | 0.9615 | 0.9599 | 0.9615 | 0.9617 | 0.9690 | T2/T4 |
9 | 0.9816 | 0.9859 | 0.9613 | 0.9836 | 0.9845 | T4/T6 |
Mean | 0.9472 | 0.9530 | 0.9392 | 0.9555 | 0.9592 |
The different methods for which the influence of array failure was assessed are represented in the columns. Each row shows the mean correlation between the corresponding estimated ratios from the complete design and those obtained from a defect design (where one array was removed compared to the complete design). Mean: shows the overall mean correlation for a given method.