Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Mar 10.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med. 2006 Sep;119(9):751–759. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.03.045

Table 2.

Hazard Ratios for Incident Probable Alzheimer’s Disease by Frequency of Intake of Tea, Sake, and Fruit and Vegetable Juices Among 1589 Subjects 65 Years and Older (the Kame Project 1992–2001)

Intake frequency
Less Often Than Weekly HR 1–2 Times per Week HR (95% CI) 3 Times or More per Week HR (95% CI) P for Trend
Fruit and vegetable juice
 Cases/unaffected 30/517 11/246 22/763
  Model 1* 1.00 0.89 (0.44–1.79) 0.49 (0.28–0.86) .01
  Model 2 1.00 0.74 (0.28–1.94) 0.28 (0.13–0.63) < .01
  Model 3 1.00 0.84 (0.31–2.29) 0.24 (0.09–0.61) < .01
Tea drinking
 Cases/unaffected 9/306 8/165 46/1056
  Model 1* 1.00 2.00 (0.76–5.24) 1.29 (0.63–2.64) .69
  Model 2 1.00 1.24 (0.37–4.22) 1.61 (0.64–4.05) .29
  Model 3 1.00 1.49 (0.43–5.16) 1.70 (0.67–4.33) .27
Wine (sake) drinking§
 Cases/unaffected 60/1412 0/45 2/54
  Model 1* 1.00 0.49 (0.11–2.10)
  Model 2 1.00 0.10 (0.00–2.28)
  Model 3 1.00 0.09 (0.01–1.43)

HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval.

*

Adjusted for years of education in model 1.

Additionally adjusted for gender, regular physical activity, body mass index, baseline CASI score, olfaction diagnostic group, total energy intake, intake of saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fatty acids, ApoE genotype, smoking status, alcohol drinking, supplementation of vitamin C, vitamin E, and multivitamin, and tea drinking, and fruit and vegetable juice drinking in model 2.

Further adjusted for dietary intake of vitamin C, vitamin E, and β-carotene in model 3.

§

Only two categories were used because the number of cases was too small in one category and alcohol drinking was not adjusted in the model.