Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep 23;31(5):639–645. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0240-6

Table 3.

Mean Coleman methodology score [1618]

Components of the Coleman score (maximum score) Individual components (score) Mean (for both observers and for all studies analysed)
Study size (10) >60 (10) 5.7
41–60 (7)
<20, not stated (0)
Mean duration of follow-up (5) >24 (5) 3.2
12–24 (2)
<12, not stated or unclear (0)
Number of different surgical procedures included in each reported outcome (10) One surgical procedure only (10) 10
More than one surgical procedure, but >90% undergoing one procedure (7)
Not stated, unclear, or <90% undergoing one procedure (0)
Type of study Randomized control study (15) 4.7
Prospective cohort study (10)
Retrospective study (0)
Diagnostic certainty In all (5) 5
In >80%
In <80%
Description of surgical procedure Adequate (5) 3.7
Fair (3)
Inadequate (0)
Description of postoperative rehabilitation Well described, >80% complying (10) 2.0
Well described with 60–80% complying (5)
Protocol reported or <60–80% complying (0)
Outcome measures Outcome measures clearly defined (2) 4.4
Timing of outcome assessment clearly stated (e.g., at best outcome after surgery or at follow-up) (2)
Use of outcome criteria that has reported good reliability. (3)
Use of outcome with good sensitivity (3)
Outcome assessment Subject recruited (5) 3.9
Investigator independent of surgeon (4)
Written assessment (3)
Completion of assessment by subjects themselves with minimal investigators assistance (3)
Selection process Selection criteria reported and unbiased (5) 0
Recruitment rate reported: >80% or<80% (5)
Eligible subjects not included in the study satisfactorily accounted for or 100% recruitment (5)
Total 42.9