Table 3.
Departure of a hospital's CSR (expressed as a percentage) from the national CSR or trend, Belgium, 2001–4.
ID1 | Period | Trend | IP10 | ||||||||||||||
LB_B2 | LB_953 | D(%)4 | UB_955 | UB_B6 | CI_957 | CI_B8 | P9 | LB_B2 | LB_953 | D(%)4 | UB_955 | UB_B6 | CI_957 | CI_B8 | P9 | ||
1 | -18 | -10 | 3 | 16 | 28 | NS | NS | 0.68283 | -11 | -7 | -2 | 4 | 8 | NS | NS | 0.51065 | GM |
2 | 24 | 33 | 44 | 56 | 66 | + | + | <0.00001 | -8 | -5 | -1 | 3 | 6 | NS | NS | 0.57928 | EA |
3 | -20 | -10 | 5 | 23 | 38 | NS | NS | 0.49978 | -16 | -11 | -5 | 2 | 8 | NS | NS | 0.18024 | GM |
4 | 9 | 18 | 31 | 44 | 56 | + | + | <0.00001 | -8 | -4 | 0 | 5 | 9 | NS | NS | 0.90712 | GM |
5 | -20 | -11 | 1 | 15 | 27 | NS | NS | 0.88383 | -10 | -6 | 0 | 5 | 10 | NS | NS | 0.93539 | GM |
6 | 9 | 14 | 21 | 29 | 35 | + | + | <0.00001 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 10 | + | NS | 0.00045 | GM |
7 | 0 | 7 | 16 | 26 | 35 | + | NS | 0.00061 | -9 | -7 | -3 | 1 | 4 | NS | NS | 0.11081 | GM |
8 | -32 | -26 | -19 | -11 | -5 | - | - | <0.00001 | -10 | -7 | -3 | 1 | 4 | NS | NS | 0.10727 | GM |
9 | -12 | -7 | 1 | 10 | 17 | NS | NS | 0.75745 | -2 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 11 | + | NS | 0.01709 | GM |
10 | -45 | -40 | -33 | -26 | -19 | - | - | <0.00001 | -7 | -3 | 1 | 6 | 9 | NS | NS | 0.67442 | EA |
1 ID: Anonymous hospital identifier;
2 LB_B: Lower bound of the Bonferroni confidence interval;
3 LB_95: Lower bound of the 95% confidence interval;
4 D: departure of a hospital's CSR compared with the national CSR/national trend;
5 UB_95: Upper bound of the 95% confidence interval;
6 UB_B: Upper bound of the Bonferroni confidence interval;
7 CI_95: +: a 95% CI suggests a significantly higher hospital's rate/trend compared with the national rate/trend,
-: a 95% CI suggests a significantly lower hospital's rate/trend compared with the national rate/trend,
NS: a 95% CI does not suggest a significant departure of the hospital's rate/trend compared with the national rate/trend.
8 CI_B: +: a Bonferroni-corrected CI strongly suggests a significantly higher hospital's rate/trend compared with the national rate/trend,
-: a Bonferroni-corrected CI strongly suggests a significantly lower hospital's rate/trend compared with the national rate/trend,
NS: a Bonferroni-corrected CI does not suggest a significant departure of the hospital's rate/trend compared with the national rate/trend.
9 P value: Probability of observing departures such as these assuming the null hypothesis of no departure is true.
10IP: Interpretation: EA: External audit and general measures recommended; GM: General measures recommended.