Table 2.
Intervention | Comparison | ||
M (SD)% | M (SD)% | p-valueb | |
Acquiring informationc | |||
Participating in seminars or conferences on breast cancer detection | 7. | 0 | 0.002 |
Physician self-efficacyd | |||
Confidence that counseling patients about health behavior and lifestyle to result in their successfully modifying their behaviors | 1.96 (0.82) | 2.71 (0.88) | < 0.0001 |
Office-based tools and techniquese | |||
Using lists or flow sheets in patients' charts | 33 | 34 | 0.01 |
Using card files or other paper tickler systems | 14 | 17 | 0.05 |
Using notices or stickers on patients' charts | 20 | 8 | 0.02 |
Using computerized tracking or prompting services | 6 | 0.6 | 0.02 |
Reminder notices given or mailed to patients | 26 | 16 | 0.16 |
Patient-held mini-records of preventive services | 10 | 10 | 0.98 |
Performance targets for mammographyc | 52 | 8 | 0.009 |
Performance targets for clinical breast exams | 44 | 6 | 0.57 |
Patient Educatione | |||
Using pamphlets or other printed materials | 44 | 41 | 0.03 |
Using wall posters or other graphic displays | 41 | 38 | 0.04 |
Using video or slide presentations | 6 | 8 | 0.26 |
Health risk appraisal instruments | 7 | 4 | 0.80 |
Nursing or other office staff and the delivery of preventive servicese | |||
Involving nursing or other office staff in tracking and prompting preventive care | 18 | 7 | 0.03 |
Involving nursing or other office staff in counseling patients about preventive services | 19 | 5 | 0.001 |
aCollected only at follow-up
bTwo-sided tests comparing post test scores by arm using X2.
cPercent of participants who report "yes."
dLikert scale from 1–4, 1 = very confident 4 = not at all confident
ePercent use routinely