Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Mar 11.
Published in final edited form as: Planta Med. 2007 Dec 11;73(15):1614–1621. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993749

Table 4.

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for Hypericum spp.

Source of variation d.f. Sum of Squares Variance components % Total variance Probability
Comparison between H. perforatum and other Hypericum species
Among-population 1 454.19 19.95 36% 0.001
Within-population 54 1905.67 35.29 64%
Total 55 2359.86
Comparison of H. perforatum accessions by geographic collection locations (Domesticated, Europe, East Europe/Asia, and US)
Among-populations 3 178.97 4.00 12% 0.002
Within-populations 38 1117.70 29.41 88%
Total 41 1296.67
Comparison of H. perforatum accessions by domestication state (Domesticated, Wild)
Among-populations 1 46.17 2.06 6% 0.073
Within-populations 40 1250.50 31.26 94%
Total 41 1296.67
Comparison of H. perforatum accessions by domestication excluding 27452 ‘Elixir’ (Domesticated, Wild)
Among-populations 1 52.73 3.90 11% 0.034
Within-populations 39 1210.00 31.03 89%
Total 40 1262.73
Comparison of H. perforatum accessions by distribution within neighbor-joining analysis
Among-populations 3 403.40 11.65 33% 0.001
Within-populations 38 893.27 23.51 67%
Total 41 1296.67

Genetic distance within H. perforatum was measured using Nei's unbiased measure of genetic distance. The highest estimate of genetic distance (0.187) was between domesticated accessions and accessions from the Eastern Europe/Asia region. While the lowest estimate of genetic distance (0.077) was between domesticated accessions and European accessions.