Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar;6(2):154–160. doi: 10.1370/afm.762

Table 2.

Returned Form Items With Errors of Omission, by Site and Type of Form

Site Paper No. (%) Electronic No. (%)
Paper-first group
    A 3/727 (0.4) 6/547 (1.1)
    D 6/760 (0.8) 2/740 (0.3)
    E 14/737 (1.9) 6/522 (1.1)
    F 12/760 (1.6) 1/714 (0.1)
    H 27/767 (3.5) 0/781 (0.0)
    J 55/764 (7.2) 0/121 (0.0)
    O 3/808 (0.4) 2/735 (0.3)
    P 2/752 (0.3) 6/774 (0.8)
    R 34/757 (4.5) 5/604 (0.8)
    S 14/777 (1.8) 2/876 (0.2)
    Total 170/7,609 (2.2) 30/6,414 (0.5)
Electronic-first group
    B 10/777 (1.3) 0/771 (0.0)
    C 67/774 (8.7) NAa
    G 100/670 (14.9) 0/689 (0.0)
    I 81/585 (13.8) 5/699 (0.7)
    K NAb 0/800 (0.0)
    L 9/750 (1.2) 0/799 (0.0)
    M 6/806 (0.7) 6/864 (0.7)
    N 20/764 (2.6) NAc
    Q 6/823 (0.7) 2/799 (0.3)
    Total 299/5,949 (5.0) 13/5,421 (0.2)
Overall total 469/13,558 (3.5) 43/11,835 (0.4)

NA = not applicable.

Note: Not all sites returned 60 forms as specified in the protocol, and the number of items per form varied because of skip patterns.

a Handheld computer was lost/stolen before data collection.

b No paper forms were returned because of staffing difficulties.

c Handheld computer was lost/stolen after data collection.